Inspiration

A Higher Court of Things   by Rev. Ronald Rolheiser

      Perhaps more than anything else, moral issues are what divide us.

Sincere people, who can agree on almost everything else, often find

themselves painfully divided other over issues such as abortion, gay

marriage, just war, capital punishment, immigration, and economic justice.

       One of the reasons for this is because, purely at the level of justice,

each of these is very complex. Inside of each there are certain competing

rights which will always make for disagreements in terms of what is asked

for by strict justice.

       Take capital punishment: We argue back and forth about whether or

not it is a deterrent to crime, whether or not it eases the hurt of the

families of the victims, and whether or not it is humane; but each of these

questions is arguable and each side compiles its own statistics and

anecdotal evidence to support its arguments. Simply on the basis of

justice, a strong case can be made either way.

       However, if we move the argument into the realm of Christian

discipleship, the ambiguity disappears: For a disciple of Jesus,  capital

punishment is always wrong and should never be done (independent of

any arguments about justice) because it goes against the very heart of

the gospel, namely, we are supposed to forgive murderers not kill them.

Jesus is clear on this: He challenges us to forgive those who murder our

loved ones and who might indeed murder us. The capacity to forgive a

murderer is one of the litmus tests for Christian discipleship. This where

Jesus most stretches the heart.

       The same is true for a number of other divisive moral issues:

abortion, immigration, just war. In each of these there are elements of

justice that compete with each other and it is not always clear what

justice, all on its own, demands. Strict justice, unlike the gospels, does

not demand that we forgive those who have hurt us, does not demand

that we turn the other cheek when someone strikes us, and does not

demand that we take the high road rather than the way of recrimination.

But the heart of Jesus' teaching does ask this of us. It asks us to move

beyond justice to a compassion, understanding, self-effacement, and

selfless love that, like the Father of the prodigal son and older brother,

can bring God's understanding, love, and forgiveness to every situation,

including murder.

       Biblical principle mitigates justice and takes us beyond it. In justice,

for instance, we can argue about whose rights are to be defended on the

issue of immigration. Biblically it's a lot clearer: The earth belongs to

everyone equally and we have a right to surplus only after everyone else

has what is necessary for his or her subsistence. There are higher

principles than justice.

       This is true too of abortion: In justice we can argue about the

competing rights of the unborn for life and the mother for the freedom of

choice, even if one does outweigh the other. Biblically though it's clear:

God is the author of all life and human life is sacred, all of it, and it is not

our prerogative to ever actively snuff out a human heartbeat.

       What isn't everywhere clear in justice is much clearer in discipleship.

       But inside of secular society, laws aren't always made on the basis of

Christian discipleship. Hence we have to try too to argue our moral

principles from a human and rational point of view. After all, every one of

these moral issues very much affects the common good and each is as

much a human and moral matter as it is a religious one.

       But, as we know only too well, inside the court of rationality, public

opinion, and politics, we don't always win. We lose as often as we win

and, too often, we get lost ourselves in the raw struggle to win.

       And yet we need to continue to be a moral voice on all of these

issues. As painful as it is to divide ourselves from others by taking an

unpopular stand on moral issues, Christian discipleship demands that we

continue to try to make a case for what we believe to be right inside the

arenas of public discourse and politics.

       However we need to accept too that, when we argue solely on the

basis of justice, we will experience a lot of strong counter-challenge from

good, sincere people. We live in a very large and diverse family, in a

democracy rather than a theocracy, and we are not free to impose our

morality on others. Much as we would like to, we can't always shape our

laws.

       But we can shape our hearts and our consciences and there, given

the invitations of Jesus, we find demands that go far beyond the

demands of justice. It's in the invitation to deeper discipleship where it is

clear that we must forgive murderers rather than execute them, that the

earth belongs equally to all, and that God alone has the power to decide

life and death.

 Ron Rolheiser

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2007.